Author: Haotian The Crypto + AI track hasn’t seen such exciting news for a long time: @GoKiteAI has received funding from global payment giant @PayPal Ventures and top VC @generalcatalyst The $18MA round of financing. Many people are confused and have been flooding the internet with questions, but most are still skeptical. Let me break it down: 1) Why does PayPal bet on KiteAI as the payment layer 1? Stripe previously announced its direct entry into the Layer 1 space, Tempo. Circle, after years of developing USDC, is planning its Layer 1, Arc. Now, PayPal has also entered the fray through its investment in Kite AI. The underlying logic can be summed up in one sentence: a battle for control of the next-generation payment infrastructure. Essentially, this exposes the "pipeline crisis" anxiety of these traditional payment giants. Their original business model was to earn the difference in transaction fees and interest on deposited funds. When a new cross-border species like stablecoins becomes popular, they must cater to the new trend and build a suitable payment system. The only difference is that Stripe and Circle chose to reinvent the wheel, while PayPal bet on KiteAI. 2) Why did PayPal enter the AI+ payment market? PayPal isn't solely focused on micropayments; instead, through KiteAI, it's integrating AI agents into new scenarios. This is because the pain points of micropayments aren't technically driven; traditional mobile payments are sufficient to support high-frequency microtransactions. However, if AI agents are to automate user payment needs, the logic is significantly different. An AI agent might call dozens of APIs per second, each of which incurs a fee. This will inevitably lead to a 24/7, fully automated micropayment network based on logic rather than emotion. Traditional payment giants understand this: when AI agents begin conducting autonomous transactions on a large scale, existing payment systems simply cannot sustain them. Think about it, a shopping agent has to complete price comparison, inventory confirmation, order payment in milliseconds. Each link involves micropayment and trust verification. How can the current centralized clearing system of Visa and Mastercard cope with it? Therefore, PayPal's bet on KiteAI is actually a double bet: it wants the next-generation Crypto payment infrastructure, and it wants the trillion-dollar new market of the AI Agent economy. 3) Why is it necessary to develop an AI layer 1? What are the advantages of KiteAI? While current public chain fee models are designed for high-value transactions, AI Agent microtransactions completely change the rules, generating a continuous, high-frequency, low-value transaction stream. Dozens of API calls can occur per second, hundreds of decisions can be made per minute, and tens of thousands of microtransactions can easily occur per day. This creates a vicious cycle: if the transaction value doesn’t cover the handling fee costs, the AI Agent economy concept won’t work. Even the cheapest layer 2 can easily paralyze the network when handling the concurrent micro-transactions of a large army of AI agents. In response to this, KiteAI has anchored the three major directions of identity, wallet, and rules in the AI Agent track, mainly to achieve AI Agents that are both autonomous and controllable. For example, if an AI Agent wants to perform a procurement task, its "Agent Passport" will limit the procurement scope and budget, while the "Wallet System" will support native batch micropayments, and the "Rule Engine" will support abnormal risk control detection and real-time interception. To put it simply, it redefines the infrastructure standards for AI agents. However, components alone are not enough; a consensus mechanism specifically adapted for AI is also needed: KiteAI's solution is to use a state channel system + PoAI consensus. On the one hand, massive micro-transactions are packaged and processed off-chain, and only settled on-chain at key nodes, which ensures efficiency and maintains decentralization; on the other hand, an economic incentive mechanism is built into the protocol layer. Whoever's data improves the model effect and whose service completes the task will be rewarded. 4) Why is Wall Street willing to invest in KiteAI? In fact, KiteAI's team configuration is very much in line with PayPal's appetite. Wall Street invests more in team configuration: @ChiZhangData, a Berkeley AI PhD, leads product development at Databricks. @scottshicsEinstein works on AI infrastructure and built a security analytics platform from scratch at Uber. Furthermore, key individuals from NASDAQ, PayPal, Ripple, and OpenAI can be found among the angel investor community. These individuals aren't pure crypto-native idealists; they're practical individuals who truly understand enterprise needs, compliance, and how to commercialize technology. In the current narrative window of targeting Wall Street, this setup is practically tailor-made for telling Wall Street stories. Think about it, General Catalyst, a top VC with $33 billion under management, invested in two rounds in a row because it was attracted by KiteAI's rare combination of "understanding both AI and payments."Author: Haotian The Crypto + AI track hasn’t seen such exciting news for a long time: @GoKiteAI has received funding from global payment giant @PayPal Ventures and top VC @generalcatalyst The $18MA round of financing. Many people are confused and have been flooding the internet with questions, but most are still skeptical. Let me break it down: 1) Why does PayPal bet on KiteAI as the payment layer 1? Stripe previously announced its direct entry into the Layer 1 space, Tempo. Circle, after years of developing USDC, is planning its Layer 1, Arc. Now, PayPal has also entered the fray through its investment in Kite AI. The underlying logic can be summed up in one sentence: a battle for control of the next-generation payment infrastructure. Essentially, this exposes the "pipeline crisis" anxiety of these traditional payment giants. Their original business model was to earn the difference in transaction fees and interest on deposited funds. When a new cross-border species like stablecoins becomes popular, they must cater to the new trend and build a suitable payment system. The only difference is that Stripe and Circle chose to reinvent the wheel, while PayPal bet on KiteAI. 2) Why did PayPal enter the AI+ payment market? PayPal isn't solely focused on micropayments; instead, through KiteAI, it's integrating AI agents into new scenarios. This is because the pain points of micropayments aren't technically driven; traditional mobile payments are sufficient to support high-frequency microtransactions. However, if AI agents are to automate user payment needs, the logic is significantly different. An AI agent might call dozens of APIs per second, each of which incurs a fee. This will inevitably lead to a 24/7, fully automated micropayment network based on logic rather than emotion. Traditional payment giants understand this: when AI agents begin conducting autonomous transactions on a large scale, existing payment systems simply cannot sustain them. Think about it, a shopping agent has to complete price comparison, inventory confirmation, order payment in milliseconds. Each link involves micropayment and trust verification. How can the current centralized clearing system of Visa and Mastercard cope with it? Therefore, PayPal's bet on KiteAI is actually a double bet: it wants the next-generation Crypto payment infrastructure, and it wants the trillion-dollar new market of the AI Agent economy. 3) Why is it necessary to develop an AI layer 1? What are the advantages of KiteAI? While current public chain fee models are designed for high-value transactions, AI Agent microtransactions completely change the rules, generating a continuous, high-frequency, low-value transaction stream. Dozens of API calls can occur per second, hundreds of decisions can be made per minute, and tens of thousands of microtransactions can easily occur per day. This creates a vicious cycle: if the transaction value doesn’t cover the handling fee costs, the AI Agent economy concept won’t work. Even the cheapest layer 2 can easily paralyze the network when handling the concurrent micro-transactions of a large army of AI agents. In response to this, KiteAI has anchored the three major directions of identity, wallet, and rules in the AI Agent track, mainly to achieve AI Agents that are both autonomous and controllable. For example, if an AI Agent wants to perform a procurement task, its "Agent Passport" will limit the procurement scope and budget, while the "Wallet System" will support native batch micropayments, and the "Rule Engine" will support abnormal risk control detection and real-time interception. To put it simply, it redefines the infrastructure standards for AI agents. However, components alone are not enough; a consensus mechanism specifically adapted for AI is also needed: KiteAI's solution is to use a state channel system + PoAI consensus. On the one hand, massive micro-transactions are packaged and processed off-chain, and only settled on-chain at key nodes, which ensures efficiency and maintains decentralization; on the other hand, an economic incentive mechanism is built into the protocol layer. Whoever's data improves the model effect and whose service completes the task will be rewarded. 4) Why is Wall Street willing to invest in KiteAI? In fact, KiteAI's team configuration is very much in line with PayPal's appetite. Wall Street invests more in team configuration: @ChiZhangData, a Berkeley AI PhD, leads product development at Databricks. @scottshicsEinstein works on AI infrastructure and built a security analytics platform from scratch at Uber. Furthermore, key individuals from NASDAQ, PayPal, Ripple, and OpenAI can be found among the angel investor community. These individuals aren't pure crypto-native idealists; they're practical individuals who truly understand enterprise needs, compliance, and how to commercialize technology. In the current narrative window of targeting Wall Street, this setup is practically tailor-made for telling Wall Street stories. Think about it, General Catalyst, a top VC with $33 billion under management, invested in two rounds in a row because it was attracted by KiteAI's rare combination of "understanding both AI and payments."

Why does PayPal bet on Kite AI as payment layer 1 instead of reinventing the wheel?

2025/09/05 20:00

Author: Haotian

The Crypto + AI track hasn’t seen such exciting news for a long time: @GoKiteAI has received funding from global payment giant @PayPal Ventures and top VC @generalcatalyst

The $18MA round of financing. Many people are confused and have been flooding the internet with questions, but most are still skeptical. Let me break it down:

1) Why does PayPal bet on KiteAI as the payment layer 1?

Stripe previously announced its direct entry into the Layer 1 space, Tempo. Circle, after years of developing USDC, is planning its Layer 1, Arc. Now, PayPal has also entered the fray through its investment in Kite AI. The underlying logic can be summed up in one sentence: a battle for control of the next-generation payment infrastructure.

Essentially, this exposes the "pipeline crisis" anxiety of these traditional payment giants. Their original business model was to earn the difference in transaction fees and interest on deposited funds. When a new cross-border species like stablecoins becomes popular, they must cater to the new trend and build a suitable payment system.

The only difference is that Stripe and Circle chose to reinvent the wheel, while PayPal bet on KiteAI.

2) Why did PayPal enter the AI+ payment market?

PayPal isn't solely focused on micropayments; instead, through KiteAI, it's integrating AI agents into new scenarios. This is because the pain points of micropayments aren't technically driven; traditional mobile payments are sufficient to support high-frequency microtransactions. However, if AI agents are to automate user payment needs, the logic is significantly different.

An AI agent might call dozens of APIs per second, each of which incurs a fee. This will inevitably lead to a 24/7, fully automated micropayment network based on logic rather than emotion. Traditional payment giants understand this: when AI agents begin conducting autonomous transactions on a large scale, existing payment systems simply cannot sustain them.

Think about it, a shopping agent has to complete price comparison, inventory confirmation, order payment in milliseconds. Each link involves micropayment and trust verification. How can the current centralized clearing system of Visa and Mastercard cope with it?

Therefore, PayPal's bet on KiteAI is actually a double bet: it wants the next-generation Crypto payment infrastructure, and it wants the trillion-dollar new market of the AI Agent economy.

3) Why is it necessary to develop an AI layer 1? What are the advantages of KiteAI?

While current public chain fee models are designed for high-value transactions, AI Agent microtransactions completely change the rules, generating a continuous, high-frequency, low-value transaction stream. Dozens of API calls can occur per second, hundreds of decisions can be made per minute, and tens of thousands of microtransactions can easily occur per day.

This creates a vicious cycle: if the transaction value doesn’t cover the handling fee costs, the AI Agent economy concept won’t work. Even the cheapest layer 2 can easily paralyze the network when handling the concurrent micro-transactions of a large army of AI agents.

In response to this, KiteAI has anchored the three major directions of identity, wallet, and rules in the AI Agent track, mainly to achieve AI Agents that are both autonomous and controllable.

For example, if an AI Agent wants to perform a procurement task, its "Agent Passport" will limit the procurement scope and budget, while the "Wallet System" will support native batch micropayments, and the "Rule Engine" will support abnormal risk control detection and real-time interception.

To put it simply, it redefines the infrastructure standards for AI agents. However, components alone are not enough; a consensus mechanism specifically adapted for AI is also needed: KiteAI's solution is to use a state channel system + PoAI consensus.

On the one hand, massive micro-transactions are packaged and processed off-chain, and only settled on-chain at key nodes, which ensures efficiency and maintains decentralization; on the other hand, an economic incentive mechanism is built into the protocol layer. Whoever's data improves the model effect and whose service completes the task will be rewarded.

4) Why is Wall Street willing to invest in KiteAI?

In fact, KiteAI's team configuration is very much in line with PayPal's appetite. Wall Street invests more in team configuration:

@ChiZhangData, a Berkeley AI PhD, leads product development at Databricks. @scottshicsEinstein works on AI infrastructure and built a security analytics platform from scratch at Uber. Furthermore, key individuals from NASDAQ, PayPal, Ripple, and OpenAI can be found among the angel investor community.

These individuals aren't pure crypto-native idealists; they're practical individuals who truly understand enterprise needs, compliance, and how to commercialize technology. In the current narrative window of targeting Wall Street, this setup is practically tailor-made for telling Wall Street stories.

Think about it, General Catalyst, a top VC with $33 billion under management, invested in two rounds in a row because it was attracted by KiteAI's rare combination of "understanding both AI and payments."

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Republic Europe Offers Indirect Kraken Stake via SPV

Republic Europe Offers Indirect Kraken Stake via SPV

Republic Europe launches SPV for European retail access to Kraken equity pre-IPO.
Share
bitcoininfonews2026/01/30 13:32
cpwrt Limited Positions Customer Support as a Strategic Growth Function

cpwrt Limited Positions Customer Support as a Strategic Growth Function

For many growing businesses, customer support is often viewed as a cost center rather than a strategic function. cpwrt limited challenges this perception by providing
Share
Techbullion2026/01/30 13:07
Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders

Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders

BitcoinWorld Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders The dynamic world of decentralized finance (DeFi) is constantly evolving, bringing forth new opportunities and innovations. A significant development is currently unfolding at Curve Finance, a leading decentralized exchange (DEX). Its founder, Michael Egorov, has put forth an exciting proposal designed to offer a more direct path for token holders to earn revenue. This initiative, centered around a new Curve Finance revenue sharing model, aims to bolster the value for those actively participating in the protocol’s governance. What is the “Yield Basis” Proposal and How Does it Work? At the core of this forward-thinking initiative is a new protocol dubbed Yield Basis. Michael Egorov introduced this concept on the CurveDAO governance forum, outlining a mechanism to distribute sustainable profits directly to CRV holders. Specifically, it targets those who stake their CRV tokens to gain veCRV, which are essential for governance participation within the Curve ecosystem. Let’s break down the initial steps of this innovative proposal: crvUSD Issuance: Before the Yield Basis protocol goes live, $60 million in crvUSD will be issued. Strategic Fund Allocation: The funds generated from the sale of these crvUSD tokens will be strategically deployed into three distinct Bitcoin-based liquidity pools: WBTC, cbBTC, and tBTC. Pool Capping: To ensure balanced risk and diversified exposure, each of these pools will be capped at $10 million. This carefully designed structure aims to establish a robust and consistent income stream, forming the bedrock of a sustainable Curve Finance revenue sharing mechanism. Why is This Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Significant for CRV Holders? This proposal marks a pivotal moment for CRV holders, particularly those dedicated to the long-term health and governance of Curve Finance. Historically, generating revenue for token holders in the DeFi space can often be complex. The Yield Basis proposal simplifies this by offering a more direct and transparent pathway to earnings. By staking CRV for veCRV, holders are not merely engaging in governance; they are now directly positioned to benefit from the protocol’s overall success. The significance of this development is multifaceted: Direct Profit Distribution: veCRV holders are set to receive a substantial share of the profits generated by the Yield Basis protocol. Incentivized Governance: This direct financial incentive encourages more users to stake their CRV, which in turn strengthens the protocol’s decentralized governance structure. Enhanced Value Proposition: The promise of sustainable revenue sharing could significantly boost the inherent value of holding and staking CRV tokens. Ultimately, this move underscores Curve Finance’s dedication to rewarding its committed community and ensuring the long-term vitality of its ecosystem through effective Curve Finance revenue sharing. Understanding the Mechanics: Profit Distribution and Ecosystem Support The distribution model for Yield Basis has been thoughtfully crafted to strike a balance between rewarding veCRV holders and supporting the wider Curve ecosystem. Under the terms of the proposal, a substantial portion of the value generated by Yield Basis will flow back to those who contribute to the protocol’s governance. Returns for veCRV Holders: A significant share, specifically between 35% and 65% of the value generated by Yield Basis, will be distributed to veCRV holders. This flexible range allows for dynamic adjustments based on market conditions and the protocol’s performance. Ecosystem Reserve: Crucially, 25% of the Yield Basis tokens will be reserved exclusively for the Curve ecosystem. This allocation can be utilized for various strategic purposes, such as funding ongoing development, issuing grants, or further incentivizing liquidity providers. This ensures the continuous growth and innovation of the platform. The proposal is currently undergoing a democratic vote on the CurveDAO governance forum, giving the community a direct voice in shaping the future of Curve Finance revenue sharing. The voting period is scheduled to conclude on September 24th. What’s Next for Curve Finance and CRV Holders? The proposed Yield Basis protocol represents a pioneering approach to sustainable revenue generation and community incentivization within the DeFi landscape. If approved by the community, this Curve Finance revenue sharing model has the potential to establish a new benchmark for how decentralized exchanges reward their most dedicated participants. It aims to foster a more robust and engaged community by directly linking governance participation with tangible financial benefits. This strategic move by Michael Egorov and the Curve Finance team highlights a strong commitment to innovation and strengthening the decentralized nature of the protocol. For CRV holders, a thorough understanding of this proposal is crucial for making informed decisions regarding their staking strategies and overall engagement with one of DeFi’s foundational platforms. FAQs about Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Q1: What is the main goal of the Yield Basis proposal? A1: The primary goal is to establish a more direct and sustainable way for CRV token holders who stake their tokens (receiving veCRV) to earn revenue from the Curve Finance protocol. Q2: How will funds be generated for the Yield Basis protocol? A2: Initially, $60 million in crvUSD will be issued and sold. The funds from this sale will then be allocated to three Bitcoin-based pools (WBTC, cbBTC, and tBTC), with each pool capped at $10 million, to generate profits. Q3: Who benefits from the Yield Basis revenue sharing? A3: The proposal states that between 35% and 65% of the value generated by Yield Basis will be returned to veCRV holders, who are CRV stakers participating in governance. Q4: What is the purpose of the 25% reserve for the Curve ecosystem? A4: This 25% reserve of Yield Basis tokens is intended to support the broader Curve ecosystem, potentially funding development, grants, or other initiatives that contribute to the platform’s growth and sustainability. Q5: When is the vote on the Yield Basis proposal? A5: A vote on the proposal is currently underway on the CurveDAO governance forum and is scheduled to run until September 24th. If you found this article insightful and valuable, please consider sharing it with your friends, colleagues, and followers on social media! Your support helps us continue to deliver important DeFi insights and analysis to a wider audience. To learn more about the latest DeFi market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping decentralized finance institutional adoption. This post Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:35