Optimism buybacks tie OP value to Superchain revenue via a 12-month plan, with OTC execution and governance transparency plus open reporting.Optimism buybacks tie OP value to Superchain revenue via a 12-month plan, with OTC execution and governance transparency plus open reporting.

Optimism buybacks approved as OP token ties value to Superchain revenue

optimism buybacks

Amid evolving token economics in crypto, the newly approved Optimism buybacks program marks a key shift in how sequencer revenue supports the Superchain ecosystem.

OP governance backs 12-month revenue-driven buyback plan

The Optimism Collective has passed a 12-month program that directs 50% of Superchain revenue into monthly OP buybacks, with 84.4% support in the governance vote. The initiative, which begins with January’s revenue in February, transforms OP from a pure governance asset into a token explicitly tied to sequencer income across multiple chains.

Under the plan, OP becomes linked to sequencer revenue generated on Base, Unichain, Ink, World Chain, Soneium, and OP Mainnet. Moreover, this creates a direct connection between on-chain activity and demand for the token, embedding economic alignment across the Superchain’s partners.

Over the past twelve months, participating chains contributed 5,868 ETH in sequencer fees to a treasury managed by Optimism governance. Based on that figure, the program would initially deploy around 2.7k ETH into OP purchases, equal to roughly $8 million at current prices, executed via an OTC provider in the open market.

Purchased tokens will be returned to the collective treasury. However, they will not have a fixed end use. They may eventually be burned, distributed as staking rewards, or redeployed for ecosystem expansion as the platform and its capital strategy evolve.

The Optimism Foundation will partner with an OTC desk to handle monthly ETH-to-OP conversions under predetermined execution windows. Starting in February, each month will use the previous month’s revenue, with trades executed regardless of price, subject to maximum fee spreads and operational constraints.

If monthly revenue drops below $200,000, conversions pause. That said, any skipped allocation will roll into the next month, preserving the intended annual buyback size while smoothing short-term volatility in revenue or liquidity. Conversions will also halt if the OTC partner cannot operate within the agreed fee limits.

For transparency, all trades will be reported through Optimism’s stats dashboard or the governance forum. In addition, the Foundation will maintain a foundation execution dashboard to track fills, pacing, pricing, and treasury balances so that delegates and tokenholders can monitor activity in near real time.

The remaining 50% of ETH revenue will stay discretionary. It can be deployed for development, ecosystem incentives, and shared infrastructure across more than 30 Superchain partners. Moreover, this structure aims to reduce governance overhead that has historically limited active treasury management by requiring new votes for each capital decision.

While the initial deployment is modest in size, it is designed to scale alongside Superchain growth. As every transaction on participating chains increases sequencer fees, it also expands the base for Superchain revenue buybacks, creating structural demand for OP that tracks the network’s usage.

The mechanism operates entirely on collected sequencer revenue from the chains that contributed the full 5,868 ETH over the past year. This anchors the buyback capacity in realized, on-chain fee income rather than speculative projections or future token sales.

Strategy frames buybacks as first step in OP token evolution

Optimism Foundation Executive Director Bobby Dresser described the approval as a key moment in the evolution of OP’s economic role. The program, he argued, marks a deliberate move from pure governance toward a token design that participates more directly in the network’s financial success.

“Governance approval of the op buyback proposal marks an exciting first step in expanding the role of the OP token,” Dresser said. “Optimism’s OP Stack is becoming the settlement layer for the next generation of financial systems, and this program will help align the OP token’s value with the success of the Superchain ecosystem.”

Dresser outlined the strategy behind this shift in detail. “The goal of this proposal is to align the OP token directly with the success of the Superchain. Optimism earns real, growing revenue from Superchain usage, but historically, the OP token has only been used for governance. Buybacks create a direct link between Superchain demand and OP, making OP the shared instrument of the ecosystem.”

When asked what success would look like at the end of the 12-month period, Dresser pointed to durable infrastructure rather than short-term market moves. Moreover, he emphasized that governance will ultimately decide whether to extend the mechanism.

“Success to us means building an ecosystem that will last, which means putting the right infrastructure in place to create a new paradigm for Optimism and the OP token. Ultimately, the governance community will decide if this should become a long-term mechanism,” he noted.

The initiative also follows prior public communication from the project. On January 8, 2026, a contributor posting as Optimist Prime referenced the planned buyback in a tweet, framing it as a way to unify the broader ecosystem and shift focus to what comes next for crypto.

Governance debate over implementation and OTC execution

Despite its eventual approval, the proposal triggered a substantive governance debate. Some delegates objected to combining the buyback authorization with expanded Foundation discretion over treasury operations in a single decision, arguing that each policy deserved an independent vote.

GFXlabs was among the most vocal critics of the bundled design. The group warned that delegates might support broader treasury management powers primarily because they anticipated positive price effects from the buybacks, complicating clear evaluation of each measure on its own merits.

Concerns also centered on the otc eth to op execution strategy. However, critics argued that off-chain trades reduce transparency, introduce potential corruption risks, and may signal that Optimism’s own DeFi infrastructure cannot support basic spot execution for its governance token under real market conditions.

Some community members suggested that on-chain transactions would better reflect the network’s decentralized ethos. They argued that routing buybacks through Optimism-based protocols could distribute fees to local liquidity providers and maintain end-to-end visibility into execution quality and slippage.

Despite these reservations, the measure advanced through Special Voting Cycle #47 under Joint House approval. It cleared the required 60% support threshold, enabling immediate implementation of the buyback plan and related treasury processes under the constraints described in the proposal.

During the initial phase, the Foundation will handle implementation under fixed parameters that leave little room for discretionary deviation. That said, the program is expected to migrate increasingly on-chain over time via Protocol Upgrade 18, which will ensure that all sequencer revenue from OP Chains is collected without direct Foundation intervention.

Broader context for crypto token buybacks

The launch of the optimism buybacks program comes as token repurchase mechanisms spread across the crypto market. Many projects now use revenue, protocol fees, or burn schedules to influence circulating supply and attempt to align token value with network performance.

Results across the sector, however, have been mixed. While some repurchase or burn models have supported stronger price dynamics, others have found that new issuance, vesting unlocks, or weak demand can overpower the effects of even large buyback programs over time.

For Optimism, the announced framework is positioned as the first phase in a longer op token evolution. Rather than promising immediate price appreciation, the Foundation has emphasized aligning incentives around sequencer revenue mechanism design, treasury transparency, and a durable connection between Superchain usage and OP’s role in the ecosystem.

As the 12-month program unfolds, the governance community will be able to assess whether linking fee revenue, treasury activity, and market purchases delivers the intended benefits. Ultimately, that assessment will determine if the buyback model becomes a permanent fixture of the Optimism economic architecture.

In summary, the new revenue-backed buyback plan embeds OP more deeply into Superchain economics, while leaving key questions about execution, transparency, and long-term effectiveness to be answered through real-world performance and future governance decisions.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Shanghai residents flock to sell gold as its price hit record highs

Shanghai residents flock to sell gold as its price hit record highs

The post Shanghai residents flock to sell gold as its price hit record highs appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Gold surged over the $5,500-per-ounce milestone
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/31 01:48
Polygon Tops RWA Rankings With $1.1B in Tokenized Assets

Polygon Tops RWA Rankings With $1.1B in Tokenized Assets

The post Polygon Tops RWA Rankings With $1.1B in Tokenized Assets appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Notes A new report from Dune and RWA.xyz highlights Polygon’s role in the growing RWA sector. Polygon PoS currently holds $1.13 billion in RWA Total Value Locked (TVL) across 269 assets. The network holds a 62% market share of tokenized global bonds, driven by European money market funds. The Polygon POL $0.25 24h volatility: 1.4% Market cap: $2.64 B Vol. 24h: $106.17 M network is securing a significant position in the rapidly growing tokenization space, now holding over $1.13 billion in total value locked (TVL) from Real World Assets (RWAs). This development comes as the network continues to evolve, recently deploying its major “Rio” upgrade on the Amoy testnet to enhance future scaling capabilities. This information comes from a new joint report on the state of the RWA market published on Sept. 17 by blockchain analytics firm Dune and data platform RWA.xyz. The focus on RWAs is intensifying across the industry, coinciding with events like the ongoing Real-World Asset Summit in New York. Sandeep Nailwal, CEO of the Polygon Foundation, highlighted the findings via a post on X, noting that the TVL is spread across 269 assets and 2,900 holders on the Polygon PoS chain. The Dune and https://t.co/W6WSFlHoQF report on RWA is out and it shows that RWA is happening on Polygon. Here are a few highlights: – Leading in Global Bonds: Polygon holds 62% share of tokenized global bonds (driven by Spiko’s euro MMF and Cashlink euro issues) – Spiko U.S.… — Sandeep | CEO, Polygon Foundation (※,※) (@sandeepnailwal) September 17, 2025 Key Trends From the 2025 RWA Report The joint publication, titled “RWA REPORT 2025,” offers a comprehensive look into the tokenized asset landscape, which it states has grown 224% since the start of 2024. The report identifies several key trends driving this expansion. According to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:40