Donald Trump has made claims about Iran's nuclear capabilities in an attempt to justify his military strikes against the country, but according to a new analysisDonald Trump has made claims about Iran's nuclear capabilities in an attempt to justify his military strikes against the country, but according to a new analysis

Trump gives an 'obvious tell' that he has no idea what he’s doing

2026/03/05 22:00
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

Donald Trump has made claims about Iran's nuclear capabilities in an attempt to justify his military strikes against the country, but according to a new analysis from MS NOW, he did so in a way that had an "obvious tell" signaling that he had no idea what he was talking about.

The U.S. began conducting a joint military operation against Iran over the weekend alongside Israel, with counterstrikes so far claiming the lives of six American service members. Trump's justifications for this campaign have been at times vague and inconsistent, with one of his claims from Sunday being that Iran was just "two weeks" out from being able to produce a nuclear weapon.

Writing for MS NOW on Thursday, journalist Jarvis DeBerry noted that while some lawmakers have already disputed Trump's claim, his use of the "two weeks" timeframe was "enough by itself to warrant our skepticism." As he explained, Trump has repeatedly claimed during his tenure that certain deals, plans, or proposals that never came to fruition were just "two weeks" away.

"Major developments — a health care plan, a deadline for Ukraine and Russia to come to terms, evidence that President Barack Obama illegally wiretapped him — are always two weeks away, in Trump’s telling," DeBerry wrote. "But few of his promised developments materialize within that timeframe — if they materialize at all. We’d be foolish, then, not to question Trump’s claim that Iran was two weeks away from possessing such a destructive weapon. And we have every right to be angry at Trump using his 'two weeks' jibber-jabber to talk about something as gravely serious as war."

Famously, in 2018, Trump claimed that a healthcare plan to replace the Affordable Care Act was just two weeks away. In 2020, when pressed again about his plan to replace the ACA, Trump again claimed that his proposal would be ready in two weeks. For many observers, the "two weeks" claim has evolved into a sure sign that Trump has no plans regarding a certain topic or issue, but wants to seem like he does.

In the case of Trump's claim about Iran's nuclear capabilities, Joseph Cirincione, a national security analyst, previously told MS NOW that it was categorically untrue, explaining that the development of an operational nuclear weapon would be, at minimum, “several more months of work" for the Middle Eastern nation.

"Trump’s got to know we’ve heard him claim 'two weeks' many times," DeBerry concluded. "He’s got to know we don’t believe him. That he gave us his 'two weeks' jive anyway is evidence that he doesn’t care about the truth. But more than that, it’s evidence that he doesn’t believe he has to credibly justify to the American people his actions that have already brought death to many — American service members, included."

  • george conway
  • noam chomsky
  • civil war
  • Kayleigh mcenany
  • Melania trump
  • drudge report
  • paul krugman
  • Lindsey graham
  • Lincoln project
  • al franken bill maher
  • People of praise
  • Ivanka trump
  • eric trump
Market Opportunity
OFFICIAL TRUMP Logo
OFFICIAL TRUMP Price(TRUMP)
$3.236
$3.236$3.236
-1.55%
USD
OFFICIAL TRUMP (TRUMP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

The post Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On the lookout for a Sector – Tech fund? Starting with Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX – Free Report) should not be a possibility at this time. PGTAX possesses a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank of 4 (Sell), which is based on various forecasting factors like size, cost, and past performance. Objective We note that PGTAX is a Sector – Tech option, and this area is loaded with many options. Found in a wide number of industries such as semiconductors, software, internet, and networking, tech companies are everywhere. Thus, Sector – Tech mutual funds that invest in technology let investors own a stake in a notoriously volatile sector, but with a much more diversified approach. History of fund/manager Putnam Funds is based in Canton, MA, and is the manager of PGTAX. The Putnam Global Technology A made its debut in January of 2009 and PGTAX has managed to accumulate roughly $650.01 million in assets, as of the most recently available information. The fund is currently managed by Di Yao who has been in charge of the fund since December of 2012. Performance Obviously, what investors are looking for in these funds is strong performance relative to their peers. PGTAX has a 5-year annualized total return of 14.46%, and is in the middle third among its category peers. But if you are looking for a shorter time frame, it is also worth looking at its 3-year annualized total return of 27.02%, which places it in the middle third during this time-frame. It is important to note that the product’s returns may not reflect all its expenses. Any fees not reflected would lower the returns. Total returns do not reflect the fund’s [%] sale charge. If sales charges were included, total returns would have been lower. When looking at a fund’s performance, it…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:05
Buterin pushes Layer 2 interoperability as cornerstone of Ethereum’s future

Buterin pushes Layer 2 interoperability as cornerstone of Ethereum’s future

Ethereum founder, Vitalik Buterin, has unveiled new goals for the Ethereum blockchain today at the Japan Developer Conference. The plan lays out short-term, mid-term, and long-term goals touching on L2 interoperability and faster responsiveness among others. In terms of technology, he said again that he is sure that Layer 2 options are the best way […]
Share
Cryptopolitan2025/09/18 01:15
Russian Central Bank Proposes Allowing Banks and Brokers to Obtain Crypto Licenses

Russian Central Bank Proposes Allowing Banks and Brokers to Obtain Crypto Licenses

The Bank of Russia has proposed allowing banks and brokerage firms to obtain licenses to operate crypto exchanges, a move that would place traditional financial
Share
Financemagnates2026/03/05 22:54