Zilliqa price drops 3.6%, extending a 7-day downtrend amid weak market sentiment. Binance delisting and Upbit supply increase reduce liquidity and add pressure.Zilliqa price drops 3.6%, extending a 7-day downtrend amid weak market sentiment. Binance delisting and Upbit supply increase reduce liquidity and add pressure.

Zilliqa (ZIL) price slides amid exchange delistings and supply update

  • Zilliqa price drops 3.6%, extending a 7-day downtrend amid weak market sentiment.
  • Binance delisting and Upbit supply increase reduce liquidity and add pressure.
  • Technicals show ZIL below key EMAs with RSI near oversold levels.

Zilliqa (ZIL) has seen a sharp dip in its price over the past 24 hours.

The token is currently trading at $0.004822, down 3.6%, underperforming the broader cryptocurrency market, which fell by 0.9%.

This decline extends a seven-day downtrend of approximately 7.75%, signalling sustained bearish sentiment.

Exchange delistings and market liquidity

One of the main drivers behind ZIL’s recent weakness is exchange delistings.

On January 23, 2026, Binance removed the ZIL/BTC spot trading pair as part of its market quality optimisation.

This followed a prior delisting of the ZIL/BTC margin pair in June 2025.

Delisting reduces liquidity and arbitrage opportunities for traders.

It also signals declining exchange support, often prompting sell-offs as market participants adjust their positions.

With fewer direct BTC and ETH trading pairs, ZIL now relies heavily on USD-stable pairs like ZIL/USDT for trading volume.

Traders are closely watching whether liquidity consolidates or further fragments on these remaining pairs.

Supply update adds to the downward pressure

Another factor influencing ZIL’s decline is a recent circulating supply update.

Upbit reported an increase of 443,195,861 ZIL in the first quarter of 2025.

This adjustment raised the circulating supply from roughly 19.905 billion to 20.349 billion ZIL.

The increase, representing about 2.2% of the quarterly supply, reflects staking rewards, protocol inflation, and team token unlocks.

A larger supply can dilute the value of each token if demand does not increase proportionally.

Public confirmation of the supply increase often renews focus on potential sell-side pressure, especially during periods of market weakness.

Combined with reduced exchange liquidity, the supply update has amplified bearish sentiment among traders.

ZIL technical analysis

Technical indicators further reinforce ZIL’s short-term bearish trend.

The token is trading below all major exponential moving averages on the daily chart.

Its 7-day simple moving average sits at $0.00497, while the 30-day SMA is at $0.00519, both above the current price.

The 14-day relative strength index (RSI) is 38.37, suggesting that the token is approaching oversold conditions.

Zilliqa price analysisZilliqa price chart | Source: TradingView

Meanwhile, the weekly RSI stands at 47.00, indicating neutral market conditions.

The MACD histogram is negative at –0.000095, confirming continued bearish momentum.

These technical signals suggest that selling pressure remains, although short-term consolidation could occur due to the oversold conditions.

Zilliqa price forecast

Traders should keep a close eye on key support and resistance levels in the coming days.

The immediate support is near the recent swing low of $0.0045846, which may act as a floor for further declines, according to analysts.

On the upside, the first significant resistance is at $0.0669, a level that ZIL must close above to trigger a potential trend reversal.

Market participants should also monitor trading volumes on remaining pairs to gauge whether the sell-off is stabilising.

Short-term price action will likely be influenced by liquidity trends, supply dynamics, and technical momentum.

Until a bullish catalyst emerges, ZIL may continue to face pressure, with consolidation around current levels being the most probable scenario.

The post Zilliqa (ZIL) price slides amid exchange delistings and supply update appeared first on CoinJournal.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
ePIC Blockchain Technologies Reduces UMC OS Development Fee to 1.5%, Extending Institutional-Grade Optimization Across Mining Fleets

ePIC Blockchain Technologies Reduces UMC OS Development Fee to 1.5%, Extending Institutional-Grade Optimization Across Mining Fleets

TORONTO, Jan. 26, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — ePIC Blockchain Technologies (“ePIC”), a North American semiconductor and high-performance computing engineering company,
Share
AI Journal2026/01/26 22:15
PCO: Marcos schedule back on track

PCO: Marcos schedule back on track

PHILIPPINE President Ferdinand R. Marcos, Jr. is now “back to normal” schedule following his brief hospitalization last week, the Presidential Communications Office
Share
Bworldonline2026/01/26 21:16