Ukraine’s war against Russia is threatening to further impact the Turkish economy, as Kiev targets vessels operated by Moscow within Turkey’s Black Sea maritime economic exclusion zone.  Brokers increased maritime insurance rates for vessels sailing in the Black Sea on December 1. This was two days after the oil tankers Virat and Kairos were struck […]Ukraine’s war against Russia is threatening to further impact the Turkish economy, as Kiev targets vessels operated by Moscow within Turkey’s Black Sea maritime economic exclusion zone.  Brokers increased maritime insurance rates for vessels sailing in the Black Sea on December 1. This was two days after the oil tankers Virat and Kairos were struck […]

Rising Black Sea tensions threaten Turkish economy

2025/12/02 19:41
  • Insurance rates rising
  • Strikes on 3 tankers
  • Erdoğan seeks de-escalation

Ukraine’s war against Russia is threatening to further impact the Turkish economy, as Kiev targets vessels operated by Moscow within Turkey’s Black Sea maritime economic exclusion zone. 

Brokers increased maritime insurance rates for vessels sailing in the Black Sea on December 1. This was two days after the oil tankers Virat and Kairos were struck by sea drones operated by Ukrainian special forces. 

Both vessels, currently registered in Gambia, are subject to international sanctions after being identified as part of Russia’s “shadow fleet” – ships used to carry illegal oil cargoes. 

Both ships were en route to the Russian oil port of Novorossiysk when targeted, according to maritime tracking sources, with neither laden at the time. 

In the wake of the strikes against the two tankers, war risk premiums on coverage for ships heading to Russian Black Sea ports rose from around 0.6 percent of a vessel’s value to between 0.65 and 0.8 percent. 

There was also an increase in coverage costs for ships travelling to and from Ukrainian ports, though these remain below those for ships berthing at Russian terminals. 

In both cases, higher premiums will push up Turkish freighting costs to its two neighbours. These could rise further after a third ship, a Russian-flagged liquids carrier transporting sunflower oil to Georgia, reported being damaged by an external explosion on December 2 while off the Turkish coast. 

On December 1 Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan called for a de-escalation in the Black Sea. “Targeting commercial vessels in our exclusive economic zone is a matter of increasing concern,” he said.

“We cannot, in any way, justify attacks that endanger the safety of navigation, particularly in our exclusive economic zone.”

The economic fallout from the strikes against Black Sea shipping will be immediate for Turkey, according to Aydın Sezer, founder of the Ankara-based Turkey-Russia Research Centre, in particular trade with Russia.

“The immediate major concern is that navigation in the Black Sea has clearly been negatively impacted, made insecure and will now affect trade,” he said.

“As Turkey-Russia trade has quite a large volume, this will impact the Turkish economy. This breaching of safety and security in the Black Sea is extremely important for Turkey.”

Further reading:

  • Turkey says Lebanon-Cyprus maritime deal is unacceptable
  • Turkey’s online shoppers are still drawn to China
  • Turkish consumers less pessimistic on economy

Turkey has scaled back its imports of Russian Urals crude oil in the past month, under pressure from US-backed sanctions, from 300,000 barrels per day to 200,000. However Moscow still remains one of the country’s leading trade partners. 

Russia is second only to China as Turkey’s main source of imports and is in the top ten as an export destination.

Further strikes could see trade disrupted, especially if a Turkish-flagged vessel bringing or taking goods to Russia was to be targeted, Sezer said. 

Market Opportunity
BLACKHOLE Logo
BLACKHOLE Price(BLACK)
$0.05256
$0.05256$0.05256
-2.64%
USD
BLACKHOLE (BLACK) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Ozak AI’s $5M Presale Momentum Points Toward a Powerful Post-Listing Breakout — Forecasts Show $5–$10 Targets Within Reach

Ozak AI’s $5M Presale Momentum Points Toward a Powerful Post-Listing Breakout — Forecasts Show $5–$10 Targets Within Reach

As the extensive crypto market is fighting hard with volatility, the project that has continued to surge with unstoppable strength is Ozak AI ($OZ). The official
Share
Coinstats2025/12/27 06:30
Koscom Pursues Korean Won Stablecoin with 5 Trademark Applications

Koscom Pursues Korean Won Stablecoin with 5 Trademark Applications

Detail: https://coincu.com/news/koscom-korean-won-stablecoin-trademark/
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 18:39