Paul Thomas Anderson’s One Battle After Another just won the Oscar for Best Picture. It’s a multi-generational saga of political resistance. It’s a film about peoplePaul Thomas Anderson’s One Battle After Another just won the Oscar for Best Picture. It’s a multi-generational saga of political resistance. It’s a film about people

We're living in a Trump horror movie — with the most loathsome act just performed

2026/03/21 22:47
6 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

Paul Thomas Anderson’s One Battle After Another just won the Oscar for Best Picture. It’s a multi-generational saga of political resistance. It’s a film about people fighting for something real, even when the odds are against them. It’s bloody, messy, and violent.

And then there’s the Trump administration’s version: One Lie After Another, a violent, bloody, and worse-than-messy narrative. No Oscars. No standing ovations. A zero percent on Rotten Tomatoes. Critics are panning it across the globe, and audiences are screaming back at the screen. And unlike Anderson’s film, this one is costing actual lives.

Since Operation Epic Fury launched on February 28, 2026, the Trump administration has subjected the American public to what can only be described as a thick, opaque fog of disinformation.

Every press briefing and gaggle, every social media post, every breathless statement from an interview or podium has been a performance of fabrication.

It’s a disaster of a disaster movie, with an ending that is sure to be an epic disaster.

The lies come so quickly and often — like the poof, parody, and slapstick of a Naked Gun movie — all delivered deadpan. Because of that frequency, we’ll cite just one lie from the main characters.

It begins with the offensive trailers. The Trump administration blended real war footage with video game, movie, and cartoon clips, and even athletes, to promote the war in Iran. Critics, including Pope Leo and former NFL players, condemned it, accusing the White House of reducing tragic human conflict to a video game and sanitizing it into propaganda.

The movie, which is a bloody reality, is far worse. There’s no “spoiler alert” for this review since the lies told about this war will live in infamy.

Donald Trump is the star, executive producer, casting agent, costume designer, and scriptwriter. He leads with more lies, falsehoods, and fairy tales than can fit into a single take.

Throughout, Trump lies constantly, often contradicting one lie with another. It’s his way of confusing the viewer, stripping away any semblance of rationality, and muddying the plot at every turn.

He delivered one of the dumbest statements a sitting president has ever made about a war he started. On March 10, Trump said Iran was responsible for a missile strike that killed schoolchildren in Minab, Iran, and claimed Iran possessed American-made Tomahawk missiles.

The problem? Tomahawks are U.S.-manufactured precision weapons available only to the United States and a small number of close allies. Iran doesn’t have them. Iran has never had them. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer called the accusation “beyond asinine.”

And since he’s the star, one more:

On March 16, Trump told reporters he was “shocked” that Iran retaliated by targeting U.S. allies in the Gulf. “Nobody expected it,” he said. Nobody—except the intelligence community, regional analysts, allied governments, and anyone who has spent fifteen minutes studying Iranian strategic doctrine since 1979.

It’s one of the many reasons preceding presidents avoided this path.

His co-star, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who would be an extra in Animal House, has been firing off fibs fast and furious, so much so that even his flag pocket square seems to wilt in real-time.

In one of the most stomach-churning moments of this already grim production, Hegseth claimed that parents and spouses of service members killed in action, “family after family,” encouraged him to “finish” the Iran operation.

One father, whose son died in the early stages of Operation Epic Fury went public to say he had never had such a conversation with Hegseth. Lying about families of the fallen may be the most loathsome act in the entire film.

And it’s not an isolated scene. This administration repeatedly invokes the grief of military families to justify decisions those families never endorsed. At one point, Hegseth even chastised the media for covering troop deaths instead of the “success” of the mission.

His wicked insincerity is the only thing resembling consistency in his performance.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio brings his own flair. When mediators in back-channel negotiations, reportedly making real progress on a new framework just before the bombs fell, described where talks had stood, Rubio dismissed the entire effort as “failed negotiations.”

Reporters who dug deeper found the opposite: multiple intermediaries said a deal had been closer than at any point in the previous two years. Rubio either didn’t know, or knew and said the opposite anyway. He also contradicted Trump about the reason for the war, which means one of them was lying, or both.

Not to be outdone, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has wandered into scenes where he clearly doesn’t belong.

On March 19, Bessent claimed the U.S. was not targeting Iranian energy infrastructure, a statement directly contradicted by reports of strikes on Kharg Island’s oil hub. The claim also conflicted with reporting about military activity near the Strait of Hormuz, another attempt to mislead the public.

Energy Secretary Chris Wright deserves his own credit line for a performance combining false optimism with spectacular self-contradiction, sometimes within the same breath.

Wright declared on television that the war would “certainly” end within weeks and that gas prices would fall along with it.

Here we are approaching four weeks with no end in sight, and gas prices are up roughly a dollar per gallon, and climbing.

When pressed, Wright conceded in the same interview that “there are no guarantees in wars at all,” apparently unaware he had just demolished his own prediction.

White House negotiator Steve Witkoff has a cameo. On March 7, Witkoff claimed Iran was “probably a week away” from acquiring industrial-grade material for a nuclear weapon, despite prior claims that Iran’s capabilities had been “obliterated” months earlier.

What Trump and his cast have produced in recent weeks is something else entirely - a chaotic, improvised, fact-free performance that has confused allies, emboldened adversaries, and left the American public with no reliable way to understand a war being waged in their name.

Zero stars. Do not recommend.

And the most unfortunate part: this is one film we can’t walk out of.

Market Opportunity
OFFICIAL TRUMP Logo
OFFICIAL TRUMP Price(TRUMP)
$3.347
$3.347$3.347
-0.82%
USD
OFFICIAL TRUMP (TRUMP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
White House ballroom architect speaks out against Trump immigration policies

White House ballroom architect speaks out against Trump immigration policies

Shalom Baranes, a Libyan refugee and chief architect for President Donald Trump’s White House ballroom project, described the president’s immigration policies as
Share
Rawstory2026/03/22 00:47
Longtime Republican laments the GOP collapse into the 'gutter'

Longtime Republican laments the GOP collapse into the 'gutter'

Republican strategist Steve Schmidt says he’s been a Republican for nearly 30 years, long enough to see it’s sad “devolution” over the last few.“Yesterday, was
Share
Alternet2026/03/21 23:54