Senate President Pro Tempore Ping Lacson says this may have resulted in a bloated count of ghost flood control projectsSenate President Pro Tempore Ping Lacson says this may have resulted in a bloated count of ghost flood control projects

Ex-DPWH chief Bonoan gave Malacañang wrong flood project coordinates – Lacson

2026/01/14 16:05
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

MANILA, Philippines – Senate President Pro Tempore Panfilo “Ping” Lacson said on Wednesday, January 14, that former public works secretary Manuel Bonoan had given Malacañang the wrong coordinates to alleged ghost flood control projects.

Speaking to reporters, the chair of the Senate blue ribbon panel investigating corruption in flood projects said that the wrong coordinates led to a bloated count of ghost flood control projects.

When asked why Bonoan would “deliberately” try to inflate the tally of ghost flood control projects, Lacson said the former public works chief might have been trying to cover up his tracks.

“That’s part of misleading Malacañang because he submitted the wrong coordinates,” he said in Filipino.

Bonoan has been in the United States since November 2025 after telling authorities he will return by December 17.

Former DPWH undersecretary Roberto Bernardo earlier accused Bonoan, Senator Mark Villar who was public works chief of the Rodrigo Duterte administration, and the late former DPWH undersecretary Cathy Cabral as the operators of the “kickback” system in the agency. The Independent Commission for Infrastructure has since recommended the filing of charges against Bonoan and Cabral.

Must Read

Mark Villar, Bonoan, Cabral operated kickback system in DPWH – witness

Lacson said that when the composite teams of the Armed Forces of the Philippines, Philippine National Police, and Department of Economy, Planning and Development went to the supposed project sites using the wrong coordinates, of course, they did not see any project, and reported them as “ghost projects.”

“So substantially lower dapat ‘yung bilang ng ghost flood control projects (the number of ghost flood control projects should be substantially lower),” he said.

Because of this, Lacson said the Department of Public Works and Highways is trying to correct the list by comparing the coordinates in their Multi-Year Planning and Scheduling system to those in the department’s Project and Contract Management Application.

Blue ribbon probe returns

Apart from Bonoan’s alleged attempt to cover up his tracks, Lacson said the blue ribbon panel will also look into other new developments regarding the flood control scandal when it resumes its hearings on Monday, January 19.

Lacson said the investigation will look into the supposed links between former House speaker Martin Romualdez and the Discaya couple, fueled by rumors that Romualdez allegedly purchased a property in a posh subdivision in Makati City through the Discayas.

“If verified to be true, this could possibly establish a direct connection between the former speaker and the Discayas. In this regard, we may invite the former owner of the property to shed light,” he said.

Lacson also claimed that he spoke to at least three sources who confirmed that the purchase was made through a third party. If true, Lacson believes the transaction hints at a closer relationship between the presidential cousin and the Discayas.

“One of the stories was that a maid saw the Discayas here [at the Senate] during the hearings and said, ‘Ma’am, they’re the people that bought your house,’” Lacson recalled in a mix of English and Filipino.

Lacson also said his panel will look into the “Cabral files,” a set of DPWH documents that allegedly showed the department’s funding for congressional districts from 2023 to 2025. He added that the committee has ordered the DPWH to present the original files through a subpoena duces tecum.

The files were initially released in December by Batangas 1st District Representative Leandro Leviste.

Must Read

Who else got hold of the ‘Cabral files’ prior to her death?


– Rappler.com

Market Opportunity
Propy Logo
Propy Price(PRO)
$0.3754
$0.3754$0.3754
-0.94%
USD
Propy (PRO) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
The most popular open-source project in history almost became a "trophy" in the cryptocurrency world.

The most popular open-source project in history almost became a "trophy" in the cryptocurrency world.

Author: Nancy, PANews A dark horse has emerged in the open-source world. In just three months, OpenClaw has become the most popular and fastest-growing open-source
Share
PANews2026/03/04 11:48
Japanese Yen Soars: Safe-Haven Surge to 157.50 as Middle East Tensions Escalate

Japanese Yen Soars: Safe-Haven Surge to 157.50 as Middle East Tensions Escalate

BitcoinWorld Japanese Yen Soars: Safe-Haven Surge to 157.50 as Middle East Tensions Escalate TOKYO, April 2025 – The Japanese Yen has surged dramatically, strengthening
Share
bitcoinworld2026/03/04 12:15