The founder of the Aave platform, Stani Kulechov, is coming under increasing scrutiny within the DeFi space following his acquisition of approximately $10 millionThe founder of the Aave platform, Stani Kulechov, is coming under increasing scrutiny within the DeFi space following his acquisition of approximately $10 million

Crypto Governance Clash: Aave Founder Faces Scrutiny Over $10 million AAVE Token Purchase

  • Crypto governance tensions rise as Aave founder Stani Kulechov is criticized for buying $10 million worth of AAVE prior to a pivotal DAO vote.
  • A key proposal, on transferring control of brand assets to the DAO, has sparked wide debate and community division
  • Snapshot data shows high voting power concentration, with the top three voters controlling 58% or more of the vote

The founder of the Aave platform, Stani Kulechov, is coming under increasing scrutiny within the DeFi space following his acquisition of approximately $10 million worth of the tokens before a disputed governance vote in the Aave DAO. This is seen to have potential implications for his voting power over disputed governance matters.

The Governance Controversy Explained

Kulechov’s recent acquisition of AAVE tokens has evoked criticism in that these purchases are taking place during a voting process for a DAO-controlled legal structure with regards to whether owners of the token should have control over “core brand assets” such as domain names, social media handles, and intellectual properties.

DeFi strategist Robert Mullins publicly argued on X that the buyout was “meant to increase Kulechov’s voting power in anticipation to vote for a proposal directly against the token holders’ best interests,” indicating that token management structures may not have a strong disincentivizing effect upon such manipulation.

Notable cryptocurrency commentator Sisyphus articulated this worry, expressing a skepticism about Kulechov’s economic motives and their relevance to both Kulechov and the wider crypto community.

One of the key individuals involved in this proposal is Ernesto Boado, a former CTO of Aave Labs, and he is also the author of this proposal. He confirmed that he never agreed for this proposal to be moved to a Snapshot vote, and he referred to that process as a breach of trust.

Also Read: AAVE Price Analysis: Whale Activity Could Push the AAVE Toward $200?

Voting Power Concentration and Market Impact

On-chain governance data shows that the top three addresses in the Aave DAO control over 58% of the voting power, with the largest address alone controlling over 27%, cementing centralized control issues in what is meant to be a decentralized system.

Such governance politics has not only created division among the community but has also affected the market, as the token has shown increased volatility in price, which has been attributed in part to sell-offs based on governance decisions.

Source: Snapshot.org

As the Snapshot vote is still underway and the community surrounding the toekn struggles with issues related to governance structure, there are also important questions regarding how decentralized governance can, in theory, function in balance between the level of impact exerted by key stakeholders, on one hand, and the community, on the other.

Also Read: Aave Price Surge: Can AAVE Hit $215 Soon?

Market Opportunity
Clash Logo
Clash Price(CLASH)
$0.01865
$0.01865$0.01865
+1.64%
USD
Clash (CLASH) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37
Ripple-Backed Evernorth Faces $220M Loss on XRP Holdings Amid Market Slump

Ripple-Backed Evernorth Faces $220M Loss on XRP Holdings Amid Market Slump

TLDR Evernorth invested $947M in XRP, now valued at $724M, a loss of over $220M. XRP’s price dropped 16% in the last 30 days, leading to Evernorth’s paper losses
Share
Coincentral2025/12/26 03:56
Forward Industries Files $4 Billion ATM Offering to Boost Solana Treasury

Forward Industries Files $4 Billion ATM Offering to Boost Solana Treasury

Forward Industries filed an automatic shelf to offer up to $4 billion in at-the-market common stock to support its Solana (SOL) treasury strategy.
Share
Blockchainreporter2025/09/18 05:10