Sender Policy Framework (SPF) is a critical element in the email authentication ecosystem. An SPF record, published as a DNS TXT record, authorizes specific IP Sender Policy Framework (SPF) is a critical element in the email authentication ecosystem. An SPF record, published as a DNS TXT record, authorizes specific IP

What Is SPF Flattening? A Complete Guide To Flattening Your SPF Records

Sender Policy Framework (SPF) is a critical element in the email authentication ecosystem. An SPF record, published as a DNS TXT record, authorizes specific IP addresses to send emails on behalf of your domain. This mechanism helps prevent email spoofing by allowing recipient email servers to verify that incoming messages come from permitted sources.

The Anatomy of an SPF Record

An SPF record contains mechanisms like `a`, `mx`, `include`, and `redirect` terms. These mechanisms help define which servers or services are allowed to send on your behalf. The `a` and `mx` mechanisms reference the domain’s A or MX DNS records, while `include` allows domains to delegate authentication to other domains—for instance, including sales._spf.example.com or support._spf.example.com if you use external senders.

The 10 DNS Lookup Limit

Despite its utility, the SPF framework has a crucial constraint: a maximum of 10 DNS lookups per SPF evaluation. Every external reference in your SPF record—such as an `include` directive or a `redirect` term—triggers a DNS lookup. Once this 10 DNS lookup limit is exceeded, the SPF validation process fails, leading to SPF failures. This can negatively impact your email deliverability, with legitimate messages being rejected or filtered as spam.

The widespread use of multiple cloud-based email services increases the complexity of SPF records. Using several `include` terms—such as for Salesforce, Mailchimp, Microsoft 365, or Google Workspace—quickly exhausts your DNS query budget.

Additional Limitations: Void Lookups and DNS Record Length

Beyond the lookup cap, SPF records also face DNS record length limitations. Exceeding 255 characters in a single string or a total record length beyond DNS protocol limits can cause SPF validation errors. Void lookups—in which a referenced record returns no result—also count against the 10 DNS lookup limit, increasing the risk of SPF failures during evaluation.

What Is SPF Flattening and Why Is It Needed?

SPF flattening is the process of converting complex SPF records containing nested `include` terms and indirect lookups into a simplified list of direct IP addresses. A flattened SPF record replaces most or all `include`, `a`, `mx`, and `redirect` mechanisms with explicit IP addresses. This process is critical to ensure compliance with the 10 DNS lookup limit and avoid SPF failures that affect email deliverability.

Why Is SPF Flattening Necessary?

Organizations relying on multiple email services often exceed the SPF lookup threshold. When this happens, SPF validation results in a “permerror” (permanent error), causing legitimate emails to fail authentication checks. As a result, email deliverability is compromised, and recipients may never receive important communications.

SPF flattening addresses these challenges by generating a flattened SPF record that expands all relevant references into a direct IP list. This not only reduces the maintenance burden associated with root-cause analysis of SPF issues but also ensures SPF compliance as recommended by email security vendors and industry standards like DMARC.

Flattening vs. Splitting SPF Records

Some organizations attempt to split SPF records or use SPF macros to stay within limits. However, split SPF records are generally discouraged, as domains can only publish a single SPF record. Using SPF macros or a macro-based solution may also introduce complexity and incompatibility with some email servers. Flattening is a more robust approach, especially with automation via third-party services like AutoSPF, DMARC Duty, or Dynamic SPF solution providers.

How SPF Flattener Tools Work

SPF flattener tools automate the process of resolving all `a`, `mx`, `include`, and `redirect` terms in your SPF record to their underlying IP addresses. They produce a flattened SPF record that minimizes DNS lookups during SPF evaluation, ensuring reliable SPF passes and optimal email deliverability.

Core Functionality of SPF Flattener Tools

  • Deep Parsing: The SPF tool recursively examines all domains in include terms, a, mx, and redirect terms.
  • DNS Resolution: The tool fetches the current IP list associated with each term.
  • Record Synthesis: It generates a single SPF record composed almost exclusively of `ip4` and `ip6` mechanisms.
  • Automation and Updating: Advanced solutions (like Dynamic SPF or AutoSPF for Enterprise) automate the ongoing SPF updating process, alerting users when an outdated SPF record needs to be re-flattened.

Many providers offer automatic SPF flattening, either as a free SPF flattening tool or as part of a broader email security suite. Solutions like AutoSPF integrate with the AutoSPF dashboard and can be scaled for IT departments via AutoSPF for SMBs and Enterprise, while partner programs offer support for resellers and MSPs.

Step-by-Step Guide to Flattening Your SPF Record

Flattening your SPF record can be done manually or by leveraging specialized SPF management automation tools. Below is a general step-by-step approach:

1. Assess Your Current SPF Record

  • Retrieve your existing SPF record using a trusted SPF checker or SPF validation tool.
  • Identify all `include`, `a`, `mx`, and `redirect` terms.

2. Expand All References

  • For each `include` domain (e.g., sales._spf.example.com, support._spf.example.com), retrieve its current SPF record and extract all relevant IP addresses.
  • Resolve all `a` and `mx` mechanisms to their respective IP addresses using DNS lookups.
  • If using `redirect`, resolve that record as well.

3. Compile the Full IP List

  • Collect all IP addresses found in the earlier step and ensure you avoid duplication.
  • Consider any IPs added or changed by your business-email.service or integrated email platforms since the last flattening.

4. Construct the Flattened SPF Record

  • Synthesize your SPF record using only the necessary `ip4` and `ip6` mechanisms, minimizing or eliminating additional DNS lookups.
  • Confirm your record does not exceed DNS record length limitation (generally less than 512 characters per TXT record).

5. Update DNS and Test

  • Publish the flattened SPF record in your DNS as the new TXT entry.
  • Use an SPF checker to validate SPF compliance and successful SPF passes.
  • Monitor SPF evaluation results for void lookups or SPF failures.

6. Automate Ongoing Maintenance

  • Consider leveraging a Dynamic SPF solution or third-party managed SPF service (like DMARC Duty or AutoSPF) to continually monitor, re-flatten, and maintain your SPF record.
  • Automation mitigates risks from outdated SPF record configurations whenever your email services shift IP addresses or update their infrastructure.

Best Practices and Potential Pitfalls When Flattening SPF Records

Flattening SPF records is not without its challenges. While it powerfully mitigates the DNS lookup limitation, it introduces new maintenance considerations.

Best Practices for Effective SPF Flattening

  • Regular SPF Updating: Re-flatten your SPF record whenever you add or remove email services, as the underlying IP list can change frequently.
  • Monitor Provider Changes: Be aware that your business-email.service provider may update their sending IPs without notice. Use automation or periodic checks to catch these changes.
  • Leverage Tools and Automation: Use trusted SPF tools—such as AutoSPF, DMARC Duty, or Dynamic SPF solution providers—for automatic SPF flattening and compliance monitoring.
  • Combine With DMARC and DKIM: SPF alone is not sufficient for comprehensive email protection. Deploy DMARC and DKIM alongside your flattened SPF record for robust authentication.

Potential Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

IP Obsolescence and Outdated SPF Records

Using a static flattened SPF record can quickly lead to SPF failures as email services update their infrastructure. Automation and regular reviews via the AutoSPF dashboard or similar tools help avoid the maintenance burden of manual checks.

DNS Record Length Limitation

Flattening can lead to overly long SPF records if too many IP addresses are included. This can cause DNS issues or invalid records. Always use an SPF checker to validate after each change.

Provider-Specific Pitfalls

Some email security vendors, such as those offering Dynamic SPF or macro-based solutions, use unique approaches. Evaluate third-party service compatibility and ensure you are not inadvertently splitting SPF records, which violates SPF compliance rules.

Neglecting Void Lookups

An improperly flattened SPF record may still reference domains that yield void lookups, hindering SPF passes. Use automated monitoring to detect and fix SPF record gaps.

Staying Current

SPF flattening is not a one-time project. As email servers and services change, ongoing SPF management using automation tools—such as Dynamic SPF solutions, AutoSPF for SMBs, or the AutoSPF Partner Program—ensures your domain remains SPF compliant and maximizes email deliverability.

If you encounter persistent SPF issues or complex integrations, contact your SPF flattener provider’s support (Get Support) or schedule an expert review (Book A Demo) to modernize your email authentication strategy. Review About Us resources for more on the latest SPF management capabilities.

Read More From Techbullion

Comments
Market Opportunity
Tx24 Logo
Tx24 Price(TXT)
$0.00491
$0.00491$0.00491
-20.55%
USD
Tx24 (TXT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

REX Shares’ Solana staking ETF sees $10M inflows, AUM tops $289M for first time

REX Shares’ Solana staking ETF sees $10M inflows, AUM tops $289M for first time

The post REX Shares’ Solana staking ETF sees $10M inflows, AUM tops $289M for first time appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways REX Shares’ Solana staking ETF saw $10 million in inflows in one day. Total inflows over the past three days amount to $23 million. REX Shares’ Solana staking ETF recorded $10 million in inflows yesterday, bringing total additions to $23 million over the past three days. The fund’s assets under management climbed above $289.0 million for the first time. The SSK ETF is the first U.S. exchange-traded fund focused on Solana staking. Source: https://cryptobriefing.com/rex-shares-solana-staking-etf-aum-289m/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:34
Zcash (ZEC) Eyes Higher Ground: After a 14% Rally, Can Bulls Drive a Strong Week Ahead?

Zcash (ZEC) Eyes Higher Ground: After a 14% Rally, Can Bulls Drive a Strong Week Ahead?

With the mixed signals lingering across the assets, the broader sentiment remains fear, as the Fear and Greed Index value sits at 28. The majority of the digital
Share
Thenewscrypto2025/12/27 20:35
A Netflix ‘KPop Demon Hunters’ Short Film Has Been Rated For Release

A Netflix ‘KPop Demon Hunters’ Short Film Has Been Rated For Release

The post A Netflix ‘KPop Demon Hunters’ Short Film Has Been Rated For Release appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. KPop Demon Hunters Netflix Everyone has wondered what may be the next step for KPop Demon Hunters as an IP, given its record-breaking success on Netflix. Now, the answer may be something exactly no one predicted. According to a new filing with the MPA, something called Debut: A KPop Demon Hunters Story has been rated PG by the ratings body. It’s listed alongside some other films, and this is obviously something that has not been publicly announced. A short film could be well, very short, a few minutes, and likely no more than ten. Even that might be pushing it. Using say, Pixar shorts as a reference, most are between 4 and 8 minutes. The original movie is an hour and 36 minutes. The “Debut” in the title indicates some sort of flashback, perhaps to when HUNTR/X first arrived on the scene before they blew up. Previously, director Maggie Kang has commented about how there were more backstory components that were supposed to be in the film that were cut, but hinted those could be explored in a sequel. But perhaps some may be put into a short here. I very much doubt those scenes were fully produced and simply cut, but perhaps they were finished up for this short film here. When would Debut: KPop Demon Hunters theoretically arrive? I’m not sure the other films on the list are much help. Dead of Winter is out in less than two weeks. Mother Mary does not have a release date. Ne Zha 2 came out earlier this year. I’ve only seen news stories saying The Perfect Gamble was supposed to come out in Q1 2025, but I’ve seen no evidence that it actually has. KPop Demon Hunters Netflix It could be sooner rather than later as Netflix looks to capitalize…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:23