Interview Introduction: UXLINK CEO Rolland on Web3’s Hidden Infrastructure Layer
Rolland is the CEO and co-founder of UXLINK, a Web3 infrastructure project focused on solving the mass adoption challenge through real social graphs and relationship-based user acquisition. Under his leadership, UXLINK has facilitated the migration of tens of millions of Web2 users into Web3 ecosystems, working behind the scenes as foundational infrastructure for gaming, DeFi, and social applications across multiple blockchain networks.
- How can decentralized applications (dApps) leverage familiar Web2 social dynamics—specifically group chats and community management—to onboard the next billion users into the Web3 ecosystem?
I think the key is to meet users where they already are and make the transition feel seamless rather than disruptive. Web2 platforms like Telegram, WhatsApp, X, Discord have mastered frictionless group chats, shared media, roles, and community moderation. UXLINK replicates and extends these dynamics on-chain by allowing users to import or mirror their existing Web2 groups into decentralized environments without requiring them to abandon familiar interfaces.
Users can create or join on-chain groups using the same invite links and chat flows they already know, while gradually introducing Web3 elements like shared wallets, on-chain reputation, and assetized relationships. This “familiar first, crypto later” approach lowers the psychological and technical barriers. By starting with social utility (such as discovering friends, joining interest-based groups) and only later revealing economic utility (like earning from relationships or group governance), we turn passive Web2 users into active Web3 participants. This is how we believe the next billion users will enter web3—not through speculative trading, but through social connections that they already value.
- What are the key architectural and performance challenges that necessitate building a dedicated Layer 2 solution specifically optimized for high-volume, real-time social networking and community applications?
General-purpose L2s optimize for financial throughput, not social graph synchronization. Social interactions generate massive volumes of small, frequent, interdependent state changes:user reactions, reputation updates, and graph traversals (e.g., “friends of friends”).
The main challenges are:
* High-frequency, low-value interactions
* Real-time state updates
* Massive concurrency at group level
* Extremely low latency
* Bursty traffic patterns: Because viral events can spike activity 100x in minutes, requiring elastic scaling.
A dedicated, social-optimized L2 is built specifically for social workloads. It uses custom execution layers for social graph operations and parallel state updates for group actions. It also applies data availability designs tailored to social data. This delivers truly real-time, planet-scale social experiences that general-purpose L2s simply can’t match.
.
- How critical is the transition of non-transferable, real-world social relationships into verifiable, on-chain, assetized social identities for building truly resilient and trustworthy social applications?
This transition is absolutely foundational. Current social platforms suffer from fake accounts, bot networks, and disposable identities because relationships have no cost or verifiability. By turning real-world social connections into non-transferable, on-chain assets we embed social cost and social credibility directly into Web3. This enables stronger resilience, deeper trust, and lasting identity continuity. These are capabilities that purely financial mechanisms can never achieve.
- In a decentralized group environment, what are the primary security and governance hurdles associated with managing and utilizing shared, on-chain community assets for the collective benefit of the group members?
The core challenge is aligning collective ownership with accountable execution.
The main hurdles would be:
* Permission abuse
* Governance capture
* Low-participation voting
* Privacy vs transparency: Because balancing on-chain auditability with member privacy is something we have to deal with very often.
We address this through group-native account abstraction(with OAOG protocols), role-based permissions, social recovery, and execution thresholds tied to user reputation—not just token weight. We believe, governance must reflect social consensus, not capital dominance.
- When bootstrapping a new decentralized social ecosystem, what are the most effective token distribution models and incentive designs to reward collective action and ensure genuine, long-term, and sustainable community activity?
The most effective models prioritize contribution quality over raw volume.
We use the Link-to-Earn model. Where value is first earned collectively(based on acquaintance), then distributed based on contribution quality. This discourages farming and encourages coordination, continuity, and long-term participation.
Pure individual mining or trading rewards attract mercenaries.The social graph adds peer accountability, and organic growth. Combined with non-transferable reputation assets, this filters for genuine users who build rather than extract, creating flywheels of sustainable activity.
- The UXLINK Protocol Stack is defined as a modular L2 infrastructure. How does the technical architecture of this stack specifically address the scalability and latency needs of group social interactions better than a general-purpose L2?
The UXLINK Protocol Stack is modular by design, with dedicated layers for social execution, group accounts, RWS identity, and unified gas and settlement. By separating social logic from financial settlement and optimizing execution specifically for group interactions, we significantly reduce state contention and latency. This architecture makes real-time, on-chain social interactions practical and scalable—an area where general-purpose L2s typically fall short.
- UXLINK converts social relationships into the on-chain asset UXLinkage / RWS. What security and anti-sybil mechanisms are used to verify the authenticity and “real-world” value of this asset to prevent farming or bot activity?
Here we use a multi-layered approach:
* Proof-of-humanity signals (phone verification, Web2 account binding)
* Social proof scoring (meaning, links from high-reputation users weigh more)
* Time-based relationship persistence
* Rate limiting and cost. The system might ask a user in certain circumstances, to pay a small gas or points whenever there is suspicion.
* AI + community flagging for anomalous patterns.
* Progressive unlocking (new links gain value slowly as interaction history builds up)
This ensures Link-to-Earn/RWS represents genuine real-world relationships rather than farmed connections, maintaining the asset’s integrity and value.
- The UXUY points are distributed via a Link-to-Earn (L-to-E) mechanism. What objective and quantifiable metrics does UXLINK use to assess the “quality” or “contribution” of a user, to ensure fair and sustainable incentive distribution?
At UXLINK, UXUY and Link-to-Earn are driven by objective, quantifiable signals instead of hype: we score users on measurable contributions such as the quality and consistency of their interactions, retention over time, verified network growth they bring in, real economic value generated on-chain (including usage of products like Fuji Pay, or Social club cards), and constructive participation in governance or community work. These signals are normalized, weighted, and combined into a transparent quality score that determines each user’s share of rewards per epoch. And this goes along with strong anti-Sybil checks, rate limits, and vesting to prevent abuse. The goal is simple: reward real and sustained value to the network, not short-term farming.
- UXLINK has built a comprehensive group infrastructure. What is the immediate monetization strategy for the group layer and the overall UXLINK ecosystem, beyond basic token incentives, in the next 12 months?
In the next 12 months, UXLINK’s priority is not to monetize groups directly, but to scale real usage and economic activity across the network. We’re focused on driving value through PayFi use-cases like Fuji Pay, developer adoption via the UXLINK protocol stack, and deeper integration of social identity with on-chain payments and apps. Revenue and sustainability will primarily come from growth services provided by UXLINK to other Web3 projects, and from ecosystem growth, rather than extracting value from users or communities. We believe that once large-scale social and payment activity is established, sustainable monetization will naturally follow without compromising user experience or growth.
- With the emphasis on Real World Social (RWS), what is the long-term vision for linking a user’s in-real-life identity and reputation to their on-chain UXLINK identity in a privacy-preserving and secure manner?
The vision is a world where your real-world reputation becomes portable digital capital without sacrificing privacy. We will achieve this through Zero-knowledge proofs for selective disclosure. For instance: prove you have X real friends or Y reputation without revealing who.
Users will control exactly what reputation data is shared with which applications
—enabling trust-minimized lending, hiring, dating, and collaboration based on real human history, while keeping sensitive details private. This bridges the offline and online self into a unified, user-owned digital identity.This way, UXLINK is positioned to remain a key player in crypto mass adoption and industry growth.
And lastly,
Web3 won’t scale through better speculation.
It will scale through better social coordination.
That’s what UXLINK is building
The post Interview Introduction: UXLINK CEO Rolland on Web3’s Hidden Infrastructure Layer appeared first on Live Bitcoin News.
You May Also Like
Atlassian’s Monumental DX Acquisition: Revolutionizing Developer Productivity for a Billion-Dollar Future
China Bans Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D Chip Amid AI Hardware Push
